Skip to content

Debate over organ donation: Which system – consent-based or presumed consent – is more effective?

Debate over Organ Donation: Which System - Opt-In or Opt-Out - Is More Effective?

Every 10 minutes in the United States, a fresh individual joins the queue for an organ transplant.
Every 10 minutes in the United States, a fresh individual joins the queue for an organ transplant.

Organ donation policies worldwide show a significant variance, leading to the question of whether it's best to have an opt-in or opt-out system. A team of UK researchers decided to investigate this by analyzing the organ donation protocols of 48 countries to determine which approach works most efficiently.

An opt-in system involves individuals actively signing up on a register to donate their organs post-mortem. Conversely, opt-out systems have organ donation taking place automatically unless a specific request is made before death for organs not to be used.

Prof. Eamonn Ferguson, the lead author from the University of Nottingham, acknowledges potential drawbacks of both systems:

"People may not act for numerous reasons, including loss aversion, effort, and believing that policy makers have made the 'right' decision and one that they believe in."

Inaction in an opt-in system could result in individuals wishing to donate not doing so (false negatives). On the other hand, inaction in an opt-out system may potentially lead to an individual who does not want to donate becoming one (false positive).

The US adheres to an opt-in system, with around 28,000 transplants possible last year due to organ donors. Tragically, approximately 18 people die daily due to a shortage of donated organs.

Researchers from the University of Nottingham, University of Stirling, and Northumbria University analyzed the organ donation systems of 48 countries for 13 years, with 23 using an opt-in system and 25 using an opt-out system. They found that countries using opt-out systems tended to have higher overall numbers of kidneys donated, the organ most sought after by individuals on transplant lists. Opt-out systems also yielded a greater number of overall organ transplants.

Opt-in systems, however, had a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors. This subtlety, according to Prof. Ferguson, has not been reported before. The study limitations include not distinguishing among different degrees of opt-out legislation and not assessing factors other than consent that might impact organ donation.

The researchers suggest that their findings, published in BMC Medicine, demonstrate that opt-out consent might lead to an increase in deceased donations but a reduction in living donation rates. Additionally, opt-out consent is associated with an increase in the total number of livers and kidneys transplanted.

They propose that future decisions on policy could be informed by these results, but international organ donation information, such as consent type, procurement procedures, and hospital bed availability, should be collected and made publicly available for even stronger evidence. Prof. Ferguson suggests that future studies should explore the opinions of individuals faced with the decision to opt-in or opt-out.

The authors note that opt-out consent systems still experience organ donor shortages, making a complete system change unlikely to solve the problem. Instead, they suggest that consent legislation or adopting aspects of the "Spanish Model" could be ways to improve donation rates.

Spain currently boasts the highest organ donation rate in the world, with their success attributed to measures such as a transplant coordination network that works both locally and nationally as well as improved public information about organ donation.

Recently, it has been suggested that using animal organs for transplants could be a solution to the organ shortage, but this poses several ethical and practical challenges. Alternatively, focusing on refining organ donation policy may be a more feasible approach.

  1. Science and research have contextualized the debate on opt-in versus opt-out organ donation policies, revealing significant variations in donation rates worldwide.
  2. The study conducted by a team of researchers from UK universities revealed that opt-out systems tend to result in higher numbers of kidney donations and overall organ transplants.
  3. On the other hand, opt-in systems showed a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors, a fact not previously reported in such research.
  4. The researchers suggest that future medical-health policies could consider these findings when decisions are made regarding organ donation, and emphasize the importance of transparency in sharing international organ donation information to support stronger evidence.

Read also:

    Latest