Skip to content

Energy predicament: Innovative approach unveiled to identify households at greatest risk during energy shortages

Policy makers now have a new set of indicators to identify struggling households dealing with increasing expenses, thanks to a study published by the University of Sheffield. The research suggests that employment status, type of housing, difficulty in saving, energy prepayment methods, and...

Energy Shortage: Innovative Approach Revealed to Identify At-Risk Households
Energy Shortage: Innovative Approach Revealed to Identify At-Risk Households

Energy predicament: Innovative approach unveiled to identify households at greatest risk during energy shortages

In a recent study published by the UK Energy Research Centre on March 8, 2023, it was revealed that around 37% of households now spend more than 10% of their residential income on energy after deducting housing costs, a threefold increase compared to pre-pandemic levels. This alarming rise has led to energy-related debt reaching a record-breaking £3.1bn.

The study, conducted by the University of Sheffield in collaboration with several other universities, focuses on indicators of households struggling with energy price increases. It does not specifically mention the extension of the Household Support Fund, but the scheme was indeed extended beyond its original end date in the Spring Budget, as announced by Jeremy Hunt.

The University of Sheffield's study proposes specific policy interventions to support vulnerable households during the ongoing energy crisis, focusing on both immediate relief and long-term resilience building. Although the study does not offer detailed policy suggestions for improving the Household Support Fund, it does provide a definition and a quantifiable measure for low energy price resilience to inform policy making.

The study identifies employment status, housing tenure, inability to save, energy prepayment methods, and household composition as indicators of low energy price resilience. Common policy interventions that align with the University of Sheffield's research focus and regional policy discourse include:

  1. Targeted financial support and subsidies to vulnerable households to offset rising energy costs, including direct energy bill assistance or vouchers.
  2. Investment in energy efficiency improvements for low-income homes, such as subsidizing insulation, efficient heating systems, and smart meters to reduce overall consumption.
  3. Promotion of community energy projects and local renewable energy generation to reduce reliance on volatile energy markets and improve local energy security.
  4. Support for regional and local initiatives that tie economic regeneration with energy resilience, such as integrating clean energy technologies and fostering local enterprise in sustainable industries.
  5. Long-term policy frameworks encouraging structural change in energy markets and social safety nets to protect households from future shocks.

These interventions align with broader themes from the University of Sheffield's involvement in regional futures, clean energy summits, and resilience research, emphasizing the integration of industrial strategy, sustainable development, and social equity to address energy poverty and vulnerability effectively.

Professor Giulietti from Nottingham University Business School notes that the UK government has already attempted to mitigate the impact of the energy crisis with measures such as the universal energy price guarantee. However, the new study does not provide a direct link between the Household Support Fund and its potential impact on individual household resilience.

The extension of the Household Support Fund is aimed at providing continued support to vulnerable households amidst persisting energy price volatility and uncertainty. Despite the study not discussing the temporary nature of the original Household Support Fund or its potential failure to support the most vulnerable, the extension is intended to avoid further detriment to these households.

While the new study does not offer specific suggestions for improving the Household Support Fund or similar schemes, it underscores the urgent need for comprehensive policy interventions in the energy market to improve supply resilience and demand, as well as individual household resilience in the longer term.

Read also:

Latest