Skip to content

Medical Administrator faces lawsuit over enforced abortion restriction

Obstetrician challenges Catholic hospital's prohibition on abortions, filing a lawsuit over work order in Ham Labor Court

Medical Executive facing legal action over imposition of abortion prohibition
Medical Executive facing legal action over imposition of abortion prohibition

Medical Administrator faces lawsuit over enforced abortion restriction

Dr. Joachim Volz, a renowned gynecologist in Germany, has lost his legal battle against the Catholic sponsor of the Lippstadt Clinic over an abortion ban. The Hamm Labour Court in North Rhine-Westphalia rejected Dr. Volz's complaint, upholding the hospital's regulation that prohibits him from performing abortions related to severe fetal malformations, even in his private practice.

Dr. Volz, who previously performed medically indicated abortions at a Protestant hospital, has announced his intention to appeal the decision. He argues that the ban conflicts with his medical duties and limits lawful healthcare access. His petition opposing the ban has garnered over 230,000 signatures, and about 2,000 people protested against the restrictions.

The Catholic hospital's restrictive abortion policy reflects the church's doctrinal stances, permitting exceptions only in life-threatening circumstances and prohibiting procedures for conditions such as severe fetal malformations. This policy has sparked controversy and public outrage, with protesters expressing frustration with the church's influence on healthcare. Slogans like "Stop the Catholic ban on abortion" were prevalent during the demonstration organised by Sarah Gonschorek (Greens) and attended by politicians from the federal and state governments of NRW, including Britta Haßelmann.

The latest court ruling affirms the Catholic hospital's right to regulate abortion practices within its facilities, potentially impacting physicians' clinical autonomy. It also raises concerns about limits on access to abortion services in Catholic-run hospitals in Germany, especially following healthcare institution mergers.

The ongoing tensions between medical professionals' responsibilities and religious ethics in healthcare settings are evident in this case. The appeal might lead to further judicial scrutiny on balancing religious freedom of healthcare providers versus patients' rights and medical standards.

As of August 13, 2025, no further updates beyond the court ruling and planned appeal were available. Dr. Volz, however, has stated that his help as a doctor is "a dictate of humanity" and that he is not considering resignation.

[1] The Local

[2] Deutsche Welle

[3] BBC News

[4] The Guardian

[5] Spiegel Online

  1. The debate over Dr. Volz's case, involving his rights as a gynecologist and the Catholic hospital's policy on abortions, has garnered significant attention in the realm of women's health, policy-and-legislation, and general-news.
  2. Websites like The Local, Deutsche Welle, BBC News, The Guardian, and Spiegel Online have been following the progression of the case, as it highlights the intersection of science, health-and-wellness, mental-health, and sexual-health, and their relation to politics and religious doctrine.
  3. Both opponents and supporters of the Catholic hospital's abortion policy have expressed their views extensively, demonstrating the complexity of the ethical, medical, and legal issues at hand.
  4. The potential consequences of this case, including physicians' clinical autonomy and access to essential healthcare services, may have far-reaching implications for germane policy-and-legislation discussions in the future.

Read also:

    Latest